Search for: "MARK R. SUITS"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,213
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2010, 11:25 am
Following up on yesterday's post on false marking, I learned today via Docket Navigator that at least one Court rejected a false patent marking defendant's argument that, as a matter of pleading, affixing an expired patent number to a product could not be actionable. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 6:26 am
Recent cases have increased the potential bounty available in false marking suits. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 5:08 am
In a recent case from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the district court granted defendants' motion to limit damages for failure to mark for all but one of the patents-in-suit. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 9:55 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- Last week, in a letter addressed to Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Ranking Member Jeff Sessions (R-AL), Public Patent Foundation (PUBPAT) Executive Director Daniel Ravicher expressed "deep concern" over the Committee's addition of a provision to the Senate patent reform bill (S. 515) that would eliminate qui tam false patent marking suits. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 3:30 am
There are other lawyers with this firm, which is active on a wider spectrum of the legal services market geared toward the corporate/business sector, but their names do not appear in consumer debt suit litigation.STAFF AND OTHER RELATED PERSONS Notary for Mark Rechner: Amy R. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 9:55 am
In the newest Patently-O Patent Law Journal publication, Robert Matthews discusses the law controlling false-marking suits when multiple plaintiffs sue for the same act of false marking. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 12:31 pm
The False Marking Statute has a qui tam provision, Section 292(b), under which any person may bring suit against a person or company that "marks upon, or affixes to . . . any unpatented article, the word 'patent' or any word or number importing that the same is patented for the purpose of deceiving the public . . . . [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 6:08 am
Is the patent-marking-suit industry booming? [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 8:45 am
John R. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
Cases R 785/2014-4, R 1014/2014-4, R 1015/2014-4 and Case R 2387/2013-4Contrast unlucky Out Fit 7 with the treatment received by Tattiemoon and The Fred Rogers Company. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 1:12 pm
On appeal though the Federal Circuit has reversed-in-part — holding that the pre-suit damages were not available under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:08 am
is patent-marking suits. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 11:36 pm
Mark Evans, a former journalist for the National Post and technology blogger, reported on a libel suit launched by Toronto lawyer and political activist, Warren Kinsella. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 10:01 am
R. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 9:13 pm
FROM MARK LEVIN, the Landmark Legal Foundation’s brief in the Virginia healthcare suit. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
In support of its motion, Metaswitch argued that partial summary judgment should be granted because: (1) Genband makes and sells products that practice the patents-in-suit, (2) Genband has not marked those products with the patent numbers, (3) these unmarked products have been sold throughout the damages period; and (4) Genband has no evidence that Metaswitch had pre-suit notice of the patents-in-suit. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 4:10 am
Beverly R. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 3:38 pm
Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) filed an opposition to Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s lawsuit against him, the House Judiciary Committee, and former New York County Special Assistant District Attorney Mark Pomerantz. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:15 am
Many defendants to patent troll suits have never heard of the patent owner or its patent(s), and will have never received notice of infringement until service of the lawsuit. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:06 pm
This most recent suit filed against H&R Block by the Department of Justice is a federal civil antitrust lawsuit. [read post]
